Palates of Bees?

Let’s see… palates or pallets? Where do the bees go?

At the risk of irredeemably exposing my intractable pedantic nature, I have to take five minutes to admonish a gaggle of news reporters for their flawed word choice.

I just read a news item, published by the American network ABC, which discusses the movement of honey bees into California’s almond groves. As usual with major news networks, factual errors creep in when inexperienced staff members are forced to cover farm stories. That’s expected. When an enterprise which you know well (e.g., beekeeping) is examined by someone whose next assignment may be men’s swimwear or kite competitions, we shouldn’t have high hopes for an accurate  rendering. But, since the main tool of a journalist is language, we should at least anticipate correct usage of vocabulary.

The 626-word ABC article, Growing California almonds takes more than half of US honeybees, has a four person byline: Ginger Zee, David Miller, Kelly Harold and Andrea Miller. I’m guessing that all four had read the article before it went live. Or, each of the four was responsible for 157 words apiece and some NYC-based editor read their submissions, edited the drafts, and amalgamated them, though that’s not the way it usually works. Anyway, I’m about to get to my point.

Midway through an otherwise OK piece, we encounter this line:

Kutik [a beekeeper] loads his bees on flatbed trucks that hold 112 palates of beehives and sends them on a multi-day, cross-country journey.

112 palates of bees?  That’s tastefully expressed. I hope that most readers of this bee blog know that beehives are loaded on wooden platforms called pallets, not on mouth parts called palates. Nor do hives fit well on painters’ palettes, though pallets could be manufactured from wooden pellets or ground up from pallet to pellet when they’ve fulfilled their duties – potentially cycling from pellet to pallet to pellet.

I’ve printed some gaffes that can be described as serious howlers and I appreciate that readers have pointed these out to me. I try to remedy my linguistic deficiencies as quickly as possible. In defence of my occasional disgracing of our common language, I can offer that English was not my parents’ first language. I grew up with a slightly restricted vocabulary and a grammar that was influenced by some interesting European idiosyncrasies. Nevertheless, after decades of adulthood, I’ve had ample opportunities to rectify any minor disadvantages. However, I neither earn my living by writing nor do I focus my principal interest in life on publishing news articles. But I assume that people employed by ABC News do.

We expect more from national news organizations where communication and proper word choice are the tools of trade. By the way, I have sent a note to ABC, informing them of their blunder and providing them a link to an on-line dictionary. Their unpalatable use of palates was published in January 2018. Let’s see how long it takes them to correct it.

About Ron Miksha

Ron Miksha is a bee ecologist working at the University of Calgary. He is also a geophysicist and does a bit of science writing and blogging. Ron has worked as a radio broadcaster, a beekeeper, and Earth scientist. (Ask him about seismic waves.) He's based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
This entry was posted in Culture, or lack thereof, Humour, Strange, Odd Stuff and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Palates of Bees?

  1. gregmbutler says:

    Good one. They somehow mussed up spelling Entymology too. Oh well, detales…detales…

    Liked by 2 people

  2. It’s impossible for me to step out of my English teacher mode during the school year, so I’m glad to know I’m not alone. Even the title of the article annoys me! Maybe they have an accurate count of all wild honey bees and they included hives not used for migratory pollination services, but I doubt it. I miss the days when children could learn correct grammar from news media and children’s television programs. I would probably still speak like Ozzy Osbourne were it not for 1960s BBC programs!

    Liked by 2 people

    • Ron Miksha says:

      I still make plenty of errors, so it annoys me that the folks from whom I’d like to learn better English often fail. Here in Canada, we once depended on the CBC as our informal grammarian. Now reporters regularly treat us to gems such as, “they are clearly laying down on the job” – an expression which always fills me with images of a mattress-maker spreading soft gosling feathers on linen.


      • I make errors, too, and I’m an English teacher! There’s one on my most recent blog that I need to change in fact. To make matters worse, it’s one I stress with my students. Still, I make far fewer than the local TV news reporters.


  3. Brian Wickins says:

    I was raised in England and my sister Christine was an English teacher, so my introduction to grammar started at an early age. In later life, as an editor and publisher, I would often think of Christine as I proof-read another contribution from one of our journalists. It never ceased to amaze me how even professional writers struggled at times with basic grammar. Grammar remains as important in my life as brushing my teeth every day! It forms the basis of how we communicate with those around us, so it is very important. Ok, often we understand what the writer was trying to say, even if their grammar was lacking, but in an age where we have abundant communication tools available to us, I believe it is crucial that we continually correct bad grammar.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Pingback: Prolonging the sweet taste | Bad Beekeeping Blog

  5. Granny Roberta says:

    Palette, pallet, palate…don’t blame a writer; that’s what copy editors are for.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.