Much is made of a human’s ability to make free choices. It’s an illusion, of course, but if people should be awarded this mysterious power, then why not bees? To bolster this notion of bees and free will, we’ll look at a series of maps created by researchers in the UK. Using radar, they monitored the flights of bumble bees (Bombus terrestris).
From the variety of foraging paths shown below, it appears that the bees exhibit unique personalities. Some forage close to home, some make multiple exploratory trips, some find a good foraging spot and persistently return to it. None of the bees behave the same. They each use different learning strategies during exploratory stages and differ in foraging style during exploitation. Does such variation imply that bees exercise free will? First the maps, then the free will. See if you can resist looking ahead, but your choice (study the map or go for the goal) is already predestined.
Here are the maps generated by Woodgate, Makinson, Lim, Reynolds, and Chittka in “Life-Long Radar Tracking of Bumblebees“. The blue dot is the nest location for all four of the observed bumble bees. Bee A engaged in 156 recorded flights, mostly close to the colony. Bee B seems to become less and less focused with each successive flight, scattering her attention across the fields, while Bee C and Bee D likewise display rather different foraging patterns: C makes few excursions while D going farthest, even beyond the researchers’ map.
Researchers explain their project:
“Every flight ever made outside the nest by four foragers was recorded. . . We identified how each bee’s flights fit into two categories—which we named exploration and exploitation flights—examining the differences between the two types of flight and how their occurrence changed over the course of the bees’ foraging careers.
“Exploitation of learned resources takes place during efficient, straight trips, usually to a single foraging location, and is seldom combined with exploration of other areas. Exploration of the landscape typically occurs in the first few flights made by each bee, but our data show that further exploration flights can be made throughout the bee’s foraging career.
“Bees showed striking levels of variation in how they explored their environment, their fidelity to particular patches, ratio of exploration to exploitation, duration and frequency of their foraging bouts. One bee developed a straight route to a forage patch within four flights and followed this route exclusively for six days before abandoning it entirely for a closer location; this second location had not been visited since her first exploratory flight nine days prior. Another bee made only rare exploitation flights and continued to explore widely throughout its life; two other bees showed more frequent switches between exploration and exploitation.” – “Life-Long Radar Tracking of Bumblebees“
A bee’s free will
In 2012, Gene Robinson at the Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology in Illinois compared behaviour in honey bees as they scouted for new homes for their swarms and as they scouted for food. Robinson says that a test of behaviour where the same task (in this case, scouting) is performed under different conditions (scouting shelter vs scouting food) potentially reveals existence of personality. In the case of honey bees, about 5% are willing to perform ‘scouting’ tasks. For either food or shelter, it tends to be the same 5% of the bees which are ‘scouts’.
Having determined that ‘personality’ differences exist in honey bees, the researchers set about studying the cause. Could bees simply be choosing (‘free will’) to be adventurous thrill-seeking scouts, or is that activity due to some neural chemical stimulus? The answer was tentatively discovered at the molecular level. Similar to humans and other vertebrates, hormones and proteins are linked to thrill-seeking. Glutamate, catecholamine, glutamate, γ-aminobutyric acid, octapamine, and dopamine are among the chemicals which control whether a particular honey bee may be one of the 5% willing to seek a new home or a new patch of clover. The results of this research and the experiments conducted can be seen in “Molecular Determinants of Scouting Behavior in Honeybees”.
We are just beginning to unravel the decision-making process. All signs point to molecular biochemistry. The hapless bumble bee fumbling around the English countryside is simply a victim of a particular surge of proteins and hormones released into her tiny brain. She has no choice but to cooperate. Whether that results in wide-arcs of adventurous flower-seeking or careful and measured foraging is beyond the bee’s willful control.
Interesting musings as they have connection to some modern cutting edge questions in science and engineering. In the latter, today we are abuzz with AI. Question is – does what we call Artificial Intelligence have anything to do with “intelligence”? How we should call that what AI is? Does “consciousness” come with “intelligence” (are those machines sentient-to-be)? In science, fundamental Physics is examining the roots of “consciousness” through quantum mechanics, as one of the basic physical properties. (Side note – what article calls “free will” I’d rather call “consciousness”, nitpicking semantics, maybe but in my mind those two terms have some important differences).
As Physicist, I am inclined to the quantum mechanical roots of “consciousness”. However, we must interpret what it means carefully: yes, by those terms even an electron has “consciousness”. Yet, same as a human being is much more complex than an electron, human “consciousness” is much more complex construct… From those roots follows that our humble bees also have “consciousness”.
Another thing to keep in mind (and this hits the third modern application, SETI) is that although a bee has some form of “consciousness” – it is not human. We must not project our concept of “consciousness” to the bee, electron or even potential ET. It is fundamental property that arises from laws of Physics but as a final construct, it is not the same for every expression of itself on a macroscopic level.
Thanks. I figured that the first comment would come from a physicist!
Lots to think about here – your posts are always interesting. You say that “Similar to humans and other vertebrates, hormones and proteins are linked to thrill-seeking.” In that case, do any of us really have free will, or are humans and bees alike just dictated to by our brain chemicals?
Pingback: The Man Who Discovered that Bees Can Think | Bad Beekeeping Blog
Pingback: Turner’s (belated) Birthday | Bad Beekeeping Blog