Should a “Bee City” Ban Honey Bees?

city of the bees by stuartIn February, Toronto became Canada’s first certified Bee City. This week, a bedroom community just outside Calgary became Canada’s second. I heard the news last night on a CBC radio interview of Dr. Preston Pouteaux, a hobby beekeeper who apparently got the bee city project going in Chestermere, Alberta.

Dr. Preston Pouteaux told the radio audience that he became involved in the certification process to raise awareness about the plight of bees. He became interested in bees because he was burned out and he apparently needed some soul comfort (though he didn’t say it quite that way) which he found inside a beehive. He was weary, Dr. Preston Pouteaux explained, partly because of his many years of study. Indeed.  He put quite a few semesters into his education, attending 5 colleges: Covenant College, Briercrest College and Seminary, Regent College (a graduate school of Christian theology), Jerusalem University College, and Tyndale Seminary. After cycling through these Bible schools,  Dr. Preston Pouteaux ended up with his doctorate, likely in something Bible-related.  Today, Dr. Pouteaux is a pastor at Lake Ridge Community Church in Chestermere and he describes himself as “a bumbling backyard beekeeper” with two hives of bees.

chestermere bee cityIt is remarkable that Dr. Pouteaux, a hobby beekeeper with just three years experience, was able to get the community of Chestermere certified as a Bee City. It must have taken a lot of work, especially in his dynamic community. Chestermere has an interesting history. I remember it as a farming village in the 1980s, scattered around an irrigation lake built upon a swamp. From 4,000 people in 2001 to 10,000 in 2006, to 20,000 in 2016, it’s one of Canada’s fastest growing towns. Growth like this, of course, consumes a lot of land that used to be home to a lot of birds and bees.

If groups like Bee City raise awareness of lost bee habitat and try to mitigate the natural disaster caused by runaway population growth, then they are definitely doing an ecological service. Bee City began in the USA in June 2012 when a group within the North Carolina State Beekeepers Association formed Bee City USA and the city of Asheville became certified as America’s first bee city. The project spread across the states and now into Canada.

To become certified by Bee City Canada, a 6-page application is submitted to some Bee City auditors somewhere who assess the applicant city. Applicants need city council approval to proceed and are bound by a set of resolutions and procedures that include

1) establishing a liaison with local government and a facilitator organization;

2) developing a municipal plan that encourages planting native species of flowers;

3) and meeting specific measurable targets of hectares set aside for native pollinators;

4) celebrating National Pollinator Week; and,

5) showcasing “the municipality’s commitment to enhancing native pollinator health through biodiversity and habitat”.

6) documenting all this for annual renewal of the certification.

Of these, having an annual pollinator festival in late June would be the easiest to pull off. But meeting specific measurable targets of hectares set aside in a fast-growing community will be very challenging.

chestermere offical siteIn almost all respects, this pollination certification system is laudable. However, as I researched the Bee City mandate, I found an issue which causes a bit of anxiety for me.  There is a strong emphasis on native plants as sources for native bees’ sup.

This is an initiative about pollinating insects, not honey bees: for example, on the Bee City Canada website, honey bees are never mentioned. Instead, we are told “1 in 3 bites of food we eat is courtesy of insect pollination”. The fact that 95% of those pollinating insects that feed us are honey bees is missed. Projects like Bee City – espousing native plants and native bees – could be hijacked into an anti-honey bee movement. If you’ve forgotten, honey bees are not native to North America. Or South America. Or Australia, New Zealand, India, China, and a whole bunch of places that depend on honey bees for crop pollination and where a whole bunch of people who love ecology, nature, outdoor activities, and communion with buzzers have been keeping honey bees.

Regular readers of this blog may know that I’ve sparred off and on with a brilliant bee research scientist who works at the University of Calgary. Dr Ralph Cartar says this about urban beekeepers: “It is not as rosy as they think. Every joule of honey that they get on their plate or in their jars is a joule that has been robbed from native bees” and urban beekeepers “swamp the world with bees and the competition becomes intense and you risk losing those native pollinators.”

Honey bees are not native to North America. I worry that well-intended policies like Bee City may lead to unforeseen consequences. It may be hard to turn a Bee City initiative (which was started by honey bee keepers in North Carolina) into a honey bee liquidation program, but there are those who will try. Within the resolutions that cities must accept to be designated as a “Bee City” is this ominous requirement: “municipality’s commitment to enhancing native pollinator health”. Note, it says native pollinator.  Enhancing native pollinator health includes banning non-native pollinators. Such as honey bees.

Perhaps the saving grace for the Bee City mandates which are popping up around the country will be that the very people who bring the project to their towns – hobby beekeepers such as Dr. Preston Pouteaux – like honey bees.  As long as the pastor finds solace and sanity in the depths of his hives’ brood chambers, he (and others like him) are unlikely to allow the Bee City movement to turn into an eviction of honey bees from designated bee cities – even if that violates a Bee City resolution.

Posted in Ecology, Outreach, Save the Bees | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments

It Doesn’t Take an Einstein

Einstein fake quotes

You’ve seen the memes. Albert Einstein is pictured with a caption that says “if honey bees disappear from earth, humans would be dead within 4 years!”  I got tired of seeing this repeated and decided to dig deeper than  the hyperbole-infested reports on sites like Mind Blowing Facts.  I found an obscure connection to someone other than Einstein for the possible origin of the quote. But Albert Einstein gets popular credit at places like the Agronomist and Huffington Post. Even Time magazine used the quote (with the disclaimer that maybe Einstein didn’t say it), though UK’s Telegraph was more brash.  If you search any variation of Einstein’s purported quote, Google will return over a million relevant links in less than a second.

Einstein search

einsteinbeeThere is, of course,  no record that Einstein said that we’ll all die four years after the last bee sucks her last sip.  He probably never drew pictures of bees on chalkboards. Nor did he write much about canaries, centipedes, or cats. Einstein was not known for his musings in ecology. (He did, however, attend Karl von Frisch’s Princeton lecture on bee language in the spring of 1949. So, he had a little exposure to honey bee science – albeit, very little.)

The Einstein bee quote is tough to disprove. Any quote is hard to disprove – just because we haven’t yet found the source, that doesn’t mean it was never said. But according to Gelf Magazine, Roni Grosz, who takes care of the Albert Einstein Archives at Jerusalem’s Hebrew University, says: “There is no proof of Einstein ever having said or written it,” and Grosz “could not remember even one reference to bees in Einstein’s writings.” You can read links that analyze the unlikelihood of Einstein equating bees with coal mine canaries here, here, and here, so I’m not going to repeat all the known facts.  But this is a superb example of the ‘Halo Effect’ at work:  being greatly talented in one area makes some people believe that the greatness is boundless.

Einstein’s creativity and math skills were amazing and his physics was brilliant beyond reckoning for mere mortals. In my second year of university physics, I learned how to derive Einstein’s concept of the photoelectric effect. It’s beautiful and challenging and worthy the Nobel Prize which Einstein won for it. It’s math intense. People make much of the rumour that young Albert failed mathematics in elementary school, but if the story is true, it says more about the teacher than the grammar school student. (By 15, Einstein had mastered integral calculus.) Even today, we can be amazed by his fluid logic and precise reasoning. His physics was not a haphazard ramble of thought experiments,  scribbles and sketches. Look at the disciplined neatness of this derivation, for example, in Einstein’s own script:

Einstein's notes

One of the reliable sources about the origin of “Einstein’s” bee quote claims that it actually began forty years after Einstein died. In 1994, in Belgium, a beekeepers’ protest erupted over tariffs and honey imports. To strengthen their case, the beekeepers invoked Einstein in their promo materials. I will speculate that those beekeepers confused Albert Einstein with another gifted European – also a Nobel Laureate and also renowned for his philosophical musings. The Belgian Symbolist Maurice Maeterlinck, who won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1911, was a beekeeper. The location of the beekeeper riot and Maeterlinck’s home (both in Belgium) makes the confusion feasible. Maeterlinck used his book The Life of the Bee as a platform to symbolize human civilization. I’ll paraphrase his chapter, The Progress of the Race, in which he conjures the evolutionary history of the Apinae.  Part of it sounds decidedly Einsteinian:

“The Apinae has characteristics so distinct and well-marked that one is inclined to credit all its members with one common ancestor. The disciples of Darwin, Hermann Müller among others, consider a little wild bee, the Prosopis, which is to be found all over the universe, as the actual representative of the primitive bee whence all have issued that are known to us today.
“The unfortunate [primitive] Prosopis compares to the inhabitants of our modern hives as cave-dwellers to those who live in our great cities. You will probably more than once have seen her fluttering about the bushes, in a deserted corner of your garden, without realising that you were carelessly watching the venerable ancestor to whom we probably owe most of our flowers and fruits (for it is actually estimated that more than a hundred thousand varieties of plants would disappear if the bees did not visit them) and possibly even our civilisation, for in these mysteries all things intertwine.”
– Maeterlinck, 1901, The Life of the Bee, pp 388-389.

einstongueAre bees indispensable to human survival? In our myopic world-view, we can’t imagine life without almonds and cranberry sauce, but (as one example) Canada’s Inuit have lived thousands of years in the Arctic without the benefit of bees. To claim the Inuit have no civilization and to dismiss their art and culture because it’s not like ours is simply wrong. They built a society and a civilization without honey bees. Although a third of our crops may be bee-pollinated, two-thirds are not – and that includes rice, wheat, and maize.  However, if the bees go missing, it would be because something has gone dreadfully wrong on our planet and that would be the end of more than just bees.

It doesn’t take an Einstein to know that the sudden extinction of the world’s 22,000 species of bees would be a grim day. One could imagine a nuclear war or an asteroid impact as the cause of such an annihilation. With a global catastrophe, humans would have much less than 4 years to think about the disappearance of the Earth’s bees. Those who use the Einstein quote are trying to remind us that the planet is fragile and our activities are threatening ecology, bees, and ultimately human life and civilization. Although Einstein never said what they say he said, the absence of evidence for Einstein giving us the quote doesn’t change the importance of the message.

AE disappearing

Posted in Culture, or lack thereof, People, Save the Bees | Tagged , , , | 10 Comments

Making Creamed Honey

Brenda and Mike with some of their creamed honey.

Brenda and Mike with some of their creamed honey

If you get the American Bee Journal, you may have seen my article about creamed honey in this month’s issue. I wrote the piece because I think smooth creamy honey is a great product and because some friends of mine make some great creamy honey. My friends are Brenda and Mike. Mike mostly works the bees, some of which are kept at Mike’s place in the Rocky Mountain foothills. Brenda mostly handles the honey smoothing at her home.

I don’t know what you might call this extra smooth honey – some people call it creamed (though no dairy products are involved), spun (though no spinning is involved) or smooth (which it certainly is!).  My article goes through a lot of details which I won’t cover here, but I’ll give you Brenda’s recipe:

smooth honey recipe

It’s actually pretty simple. Heat the honey until it’s completely liquid with no granulation crystals left in it. Cool it to room temperature and stir in some creamy ‘seed’ honey. Stir and stir and stir. Pour it into the final containers and store it in a cool place.  The seed can be creamed honey from your previous batch of creamed honey. If this is your first year making the stuff, you’ll have to get some creamy (“spun”) honey at the grocery or from a friend. After that, keep some in reserve for the next crop. People use from 5 to 20 percent seed, but most add about 10 percent.

creamed honey

Once ‘creamed’, the honey will stay this smooth for months – or even years.

Posted in Friends, Hive Products, Honey | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

A Lite Harvest from the FlowHive Super

This gallery contains 4 photos.

Originally posted on Adventures of a beekeeper:
After months and months and after harvesting almost 100 pounds from regular supers, I finally got a little honey from my FlowHive super. I didn’t have the full set-up, just the frames to…

More Galleries | Tagged | Leave a comment

Drone Congregations

This is a clever turn on Drone Congregation Areas!

BeeNuts's avatarBee-Nuts

Cartoon 19

On summer afternoons scores of male bees (called drones) gather together in specific areas of the sky and wait for virgin queens to join them. When a queen does approach a spectacular chase begins which ends up in the queen being mated several times, and the successful drones instantly dying! (See Performance Anxiety) Most beekeepers would be very excited to see one of these ‘drone congregation areas’.

The cartoon was inspired by Harry, one of our local beekeepers, who has been keeping bees for 70 years.

Last year he got himself a quadcopter (also known as a ‘drone’) and took to the skies in search of drone congregation areas. Problem is I’m not sure which sort!

View original post

Posted in Humour, Reblogs | Tagged , | Leave a comment

EpiPens: $250 in USA; $85 in Canada

Here’s something sure to stir controversy. The price of the life-saving EpiPen went from $50 US (in 2008) to somewhere between $250 and $400 US this month. That’s if you live in the USA.

This morning, I was at the Calgary Co-op Pharmacy here in Alberta, Canada. I asked the fellow behind the counter for a price on the EpiPen. $109 Canadian. (That’s about $85 US.)

epipen price tweetI’m confused about the price in the USA because every story I read uses different numbers. Here, Bernie Sanders says $600 for a set of two. According to Wall Street Journal, some folks were asked to pay $1212 for two packs of two pens – that’s $300 each. These devices save lives, so people will buy them. Sometimes for any price, but sometimes not.

beestingineyeWe have an interest in the price of EpiPens. So should you, if you are a beekeeper or if you know someone with a milk, egg, peanut, bee sting, or other allergy. If you suffer from a typical bee sting reaction, you may get nasty swelling. Sometimes it’s so bad an eye may swell shut for a few days. This is not necessarily a severe allergic reaction but may be just a local response to venom in the skin. Things may go terribly wrong, however, when the victim enters a full anaphylactic shock with swelling throat, arrhythmic heart, and a general allergic response which can quickly be fatal. A shot of epinephrine from an EpiPen can save a life. Am I scaring you? Fright is part of the EpiPen’s marketing strategy. You might like to see Bloomberg’s story: How Marketing Turned the EpiPen Into a Billion-Dollar Business.

Administered promptly, EpiPens can stop an anaphylactic allergic reaction from becoming fatal. Most beekeepers own several kits. They stow them in their truck, along with antihistamine, just in case a worker, family member, or passerby gets stung by a honey bee and has a life-threatening reaction.

mylan 500 percent

Is Mylan, the company that makes and sells EpiPens, gauging customers who would die without the product? The company claims that nearly 80% of all “commercially insured” customers actually get the injection kits for no cost, zero, zip. Even if it’s true (these reporters suggest it’s perhaps not true), that’s a despicable claim because it implies there really is such a thing as a free lunch (and maybe Santa, too). ‘Commercially insured’ means that Blue Cross or some company’s drug plan is paying the full price-gauging price. Here’s how Mylan says it on their website:

“Previously a patient may have paid a $25 co-pay for a prescription regardless of the product cost. Today, with a high deductible health plan, they must pay the full product cost, which they may have previously been unaware of, until their deductible is reached.”

So, if you are upset about paying so much for EpiPens, it’s obviously your fault for not paying for better insurance.  On Mylan’s website, the company rather defensively claims that the problem isn’t that they raised their price, but Mylan claims, people are taking insurance packages with bigger deductibles, so consumers are paying more out-of-pocket and thus are complaining. Why are people taking bigger deductible insurance? Because price-gauging pharmas have forced insurance companies to raise premiums. “Why Did Mylan Hike EpiPen Prices 400%?” asks business magazine Forbes. “Because They Could”, says Forbes.

The cost of making and distributing these kits is about $20. Mylan was making a healthy profit before they decided to make an obscene profit. Mylan made a $1.2 billion profit last year. The CEO’s salary went up 700% in three years. The company president, Heather Bresch, received $18 million last year from the company. The company is doing OK. Maybe pen users should hold their noses and buy some shares.

epipen prices

Price for a two-pack of EpiPens

Meanwhile here in Canada, I can’t explain why our corner pharmacy (or others across Canada) sell EpiPens at reasonable prices. They are made by the same company (Mylan) which has a corporate office here. It’s likely related to government oversight, insurance company policies, and the difference in the medical and drug culture between the countries (Americans seem conditioned to pay unhealthy amounts of money for health care).

I won’t recommend that Americans should fly up to Canada to buy this medicine.  I don’t know much about trans-border shopping, but I found this piece, written two years. The blogger writes about driving from Seattle, north to BC, to pick up her life-saving meds for $9.99. Less than ten dollars? Well, that was two years ago.


Here’s an update, 3 days after I posted this story:

Apparently, there’s a way to substitute the EpiPen for just a few bucks.

ten dollar epi-kit

Posted in Culture, or lack thereof, Stings | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Tisdale, Saskatchewan, Improves its Image

landofrapeandhoney

It’s about time. Tisdale, Saskatchewan has finally reformed its town sign and slogan. No longer will it be the Land of Rape & Honey. I thought that they’d go with the Land of Canola & Honey. But Opportunity knocked.

new Tisdale signThe town debated changing their image (and their signs and stationery) for over a year and finally made the switch official today. I like the new slogan (Opportunity Grows Here) and congratulate the town for making it through this difficult (for them?) decision. Here’s one of the new signs, on the left. I photographed the old sign way back in 1976 when I was in Tisdale for a beekeepers’ meeting.

I wrote about this over a year ago, and I can’t help repeating myself. I can’t help repeating myself. So here goes, flashback to April, 2015:


After 60 years, the good people of Tisdale, Saskatchewan, are thinking of changing their slogan from “Land of Rape and Honey” to . . . something else. Well, it’s about time. Every town and village should reconsider logos, symbols, signs, and slogans that have been around for 50 or 60 years. Shake things up a bit.

Apparently, the old slogan made sense at the time. Tisdale, up in the northeast part of Saskatchewan’s black soil district was a great place for farmers and beekeepers sixty years ago. There was so much honey produced in the area that a big co-op warehouse was built to handle, process, and export several million pounds of the sweet stuff every year. Rape seed – genetically engineered and rebranded as canola – was the biggest cash crop. When I kept bees in northern Saskatchewan in the 1980s, canola was just catching on. Farmers loved the stuff – it grew well on freshly deforested parkland, and it sold for a fair price. (It is remarkable to realize that new farmland was still opening up by the thousands of acres a year, just thirty years ago in Canada.) Farmers loved canola, but they still called it rape. Just as the 60-year-old slogan in Tisdale still does.

Tisdale is thinking about changing with the times. The obviously crude slogan became even more crude when rape disappeared and canola took its place in the fields of Saskatchewan. Meanwhile, the farmers’ vocabulary remained stagnant. The town held a survey 20 years ago, trying to decide if it was time for an update back in 1992, but the vote was evenly split, so the slogan stayed. But times change. Today, less than one percent of the local cropland is planted in rapeseed. So the change-the-words campaign is holding another vote and is inviting submissions for a new slogan. “A Great Place to Bee” and “Hub of the Northeast” seem to be front runners. But “Less Rape and More Honey” will probably be the winner.

Posted in Culture, or lack thereof, Strange, Odd Stuff | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A Bee with Racing Stripes?

My friend Stephen was helping a new beekeeper when they spotted these spotted honey bees. It almost looks like someone was doing a science experiment using marked bees. It’s probably sticky pollen that got glued to the bees’ blind spots – the spot where a bee can’t reach to scratch her itch or her stuck pollen. Stephen says there were five or six of these bees.  Have you ever seen anything like this?

Yellow-dusted honey bees. A new species? Freaks of nature? Supernatural phenomena? What do you think?  (Photo credit: Stephen Bennett)

Yellow-dusted honey bees. A new species? Freaks of nature?
Supernatural phenomena? What do you think?
(Photo credit: Stephen Bennett)

Posted in Bee Biology, Friends, Strange, Odd Stuff | Tagged | 12 Comments

Insect ID Workshop

This gallery contains 8 photos.

Originally posted on LSE Bees:
Can you spot anything wrong with the book cover shown below? (The answer is below the picture.) Yes, the insect in question is a fly, not a bee. In a similar vein, a Guardian article about bees published…

More Galleries | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Good News: No Killer Bees at the Olympics

killer bees movie 1

Whatever happened to the Killer Bees? Killer Bees – more accurately, hybrids of European and African honey bees – were supposed to destroy the world, or at least kill a lot of people trying. They started out in Brazil, not far from the Olympics venues. So why didn’t they show up at the games? Brazil was plagued with slimy water, fires in athletes’ dorms, robberies, a presidentialindignantimpeachment, bullets in bus windows, doping scandals, ticket scandals, a gas station scandal, and, on the last day, an indignant Mongolian coach who stripped off his clothes and threw them at the judges.

I was sure that a massive swarm of eight million killer bees would drop from the sky during closing ceremonies. But along with the massive numbers of local volunteers who didn’t show up, massive amounts of bees were also no-shows.

What does this mean for Brazil’s reputation on the world stage when its own killer bees boycott the event? News reporters ignored bees altogether. That wasn’t the way it was in Brazil a few years ago.

Here’s the backstory. African honey bees arrived in Brazil in 1956. They were brought by a geneticist who was trying to develop a better bee for Brazilian farmers. Brazilian farmers had been using stock which was brought to Brazil from Portugal centuries earlier. Those bees were not well-adapted to the tropical climate. African bees are hardier, healthier, and better producers than European stock, especially in tropical climates. So, 26 queen bees from Tanzania arrived in Brazil to help Brazil’s honey production and pollination. How did that work out? Actually, very well for the beekeepers and the country’s agriculture.

The African bee turned into the Africanized bee in 1957 when the local European bees interbred with the new arrivals. This was supposed to happen in a controlled project over a few years, but a technician helping with the breeding program mistakenly removed wire screens from the pure African queens’ hives, allowing them to escape. This ruined the bee breeding program. The new hybrid Africanized strain became feral, populating the surrounding rain forest. Eventually, the Africanized genes spread throughout the American tropics, creating a hybrid which is more aggressive than the generally docile European strain. The new strain has been called the Africanized Honey Bee (AHB), though the press dubbed the offspring Killer Bees following reports that beekeepers and by-standers were being killed by the new bee-blend.

As the AHB’s genetic stock approached the northern hemisphere, stories about the bees’ attacks on people became more and more sensational. There were some disturbingly inaccurate pseudo-science documentaries. Some showed that the bees were a communist plot to destroy America, or at least were a notice from God that He’s irritated with us all. The excitement climaxed in horror movies that delighted voyeuristic viewers.

Killer Bees (1974), The Swarm (1978), Deadly Invasion: The Killer Bee Nightmare (1995), Killer Bees! (2002), and Killer Bees (2008)  all had their charms, of course. The most successful of the lot, Arthur Herzog’s The Swarm, imagined killer bee attacks that claimed 37,000 lives, instigated the explosion of a nuclear power plant, and lit the entire city of Houston with a fireball of Armageddon proportions. The movie starred Henry Fonda, Micheal Caine, Olivia de Havilland and other big names, but it still hit the list of worst films ever made. The recurring theme of deadly bees running amok and  attacking and killing with little warning reinforced the common dreadful fear that honey bees have an unpredictable dark side.

Well, with all those reports of Assassin Bees overrunning the country, we figured it was game over for Brazil’s fledgling honey industry. But a funny thing happened on the way to death and destruction. Brazilian beekeepers got used to the bad bees. They learned to manage them. European bees were outpaced by the new African arrivals. It seems that tropical bees perform better in the tropics than non-tropical bees. Brazil’s annual honey production quickly rose from 15 (pre-AHB) to over 110 million pounds (post-AHB). This was noticed by some of the American media.  In 1994, L.A. Times headlined: “Brazil’s honey production has soared since the ornery invaders took over beekeepers’ hives”.

I don’t want to trivialize the tragedies that happen when people stumble across Africanized bee nests. Although the bees can be kept and managed by beekeepers, they are much more defensive than the European stock we typically keep in the north. Instead of a few stings from a hive, the Africanized bees may defend with a few hundred stings. Venom overload can kill – about 50 known deaths due to massive stinging have occurred since the bees arrived in the 1950s, but the actual total may be twice that. (Though still short of The Swarm’s 37,000 deaths.)

swarm is comingRegardless the predictions (some of them made by notable bee scientists), Africanized bees did not destroy North American agriculture. Although they’ve been in the USA since 1990, they didn’t reach Washington D.C. by 1995 as many expected. Africanized bees barely spread past Louisiana in 20 years. Some that arrived on cargo ships in Florida years ago haven’t expanded very far nor have they interfered much with normal beekeeping and farming in the sunshine state. Africanized bees roamed around a bit more on the west coast, but millions of out-of-state hives continue to arrive each winter to pollinate the almonds – and they apparently head back to Maine and Montana and elsewhere non-Africanized. In short, the hype was mostly hype.

Meanwhile, in the original homeland of the hybrid bee, Brazil’s Africanized bees didn’t make pre-game chatter even when the announcers were so bored that they resorted to discussing one athlete’s favourite books. The bees were far below international radar.  To be fair, when it became apparent that the killer bees would be a no-show, Brazil did manage to conjure up millions of Zika-infested mosquitoes, partly redeeming the reputation of the country’s miscreant insects.

Posted in Beekeeping, Culture, or lack thereof, Diseases and Pests, History, Humour, Killer Bees, Movies, Stings, Swarms | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment