A Look Back at 2015

bennynewyearIt’s been quite a year. A lot happened to beekeeping in 2015. Early in the year, honey prices soared to unprecedented levels, making beekeepers exceedingly wealthy. (Or maybe not.) Since mid-summer, however, the wholesale price of honey has fallen dramatically, impoverishing those same beekeepers.

Meanwhile, in science, a new idea about royal jelly emerged, completely overturning what we thought we knew about the magical stuff. During the past year or two, genetics was big, too, with a German researcher splicing a gene into the bee genome that makes bees glow in the dark. Late in the year, bees were spotted with rare black pollen – it turned out to be coffee grounds.  And, as has been the trend for twenty years, Saving the Bees continues to be the rallying call against GMOs, neonics, and multinational drug/chemical/seed cartels. Expect more of the same in 2016.

I know a little about bees, but certainly not everything. If you are looking for “How To…” beekeep pages, there are better websites than mine. My friend Allen Dick of Swalwell, Alberta, has been running one of the best of that sort for 20 years. Another great site (I like it so much that I donate) is produced by Randy Oliver. It’s mostly about bee diseases and sciency stuff, and is perfect for the intermediate to advanced beekeeper. There are, of course, a thousand other worthy sites to investigate as well.

As I said, this blog isn’t the best for everyday beekeeping stuff. Although I have worked with bees for over 40 years (and was a commercial beekeeper for 20), I really am one of the best examples of this adage: “Beekeeping is one of those things where the newbie feels like he knows everything. But as the years go by, he realizes that he knows less and less until eventually the bees show that the beekeeper doesn’t know anything at all.” Most days, that’s where I am.

What’s in my blog? For one thing, I’m big on learning from mistakes, having made so many myself. So, you will find some candid material that might show you epic fails to avoid. If you’re not keeping bees, you may still enjoy this blog because of my cynical tone, the warty growth of six decades of sardonic observations and musings. I am skeptical of everything, having seen all manner of promotions for better queens, better hives, and better beekeeping. I come down hard on these, especially when I smell hidden agendas and profiteering.

Here were the most popular Bad Beekeeping posts in 2015…

The most popular post for 2015 was Russian Plane Attacked by Bees. It’s not my best piece, but it was picked up by a big international news aggregator. I guess it was interesting to travelers and Russophiles. Maybe you liked it, too.

Number two in popularity was Mr Holmes’ Bees, my review of a gentle beekeeping movie about the Sherlock Holmes character.

I published Smoky Bees back in August when the American northwest forests were ablaze and Calgary bees were detained in their hives because of thick nauseating smoke. My piece looks at the old question of why bees gorge themselves with honey when they smell smoke, yet stay in their hives and burn when their hive catches fire.

Bees, the World’s Pollinators, was one of several book reviews I wrote over the past year. The book is a lovely photo essay about the various types of bees found around the world. In a cameo appearance, honey bees are given a two-page spread.

My fifth-most-popular blog post for 2015 was a look at “the forgotten disease” American foulbrood. AFB is ravaging beekeeping in South Africa. In other parts of the world, it’s mutating and becoming resistant to antibiotics. I remind people of this in Foulbrood: Still Smelling Foul.

Thanks for reading my blogsite about our most precious resource, our honey bees. (Kids are a close second.) I hope you have a great new year. I’m sure that 2016 will have even more entertaining bee stories. I’ll do my best to make you aware of them.

Posted in Culture, or lack thereof, Outreach | Tagged | Leave a comment

Another Revolutionary Beehive

Edmonton Journal Headline google stories

Revolutionary Headlines

Ah, yet another revolutionary beehive. You know, it’s more suited to the needs of the bees, yet better for the beekeeper. In this case, an Edmonton (Alberta, Canada) designer has come up with a beehive that holds 8 frames instead of 10 and uses a 6-and-5/8-inch box instead of the deeper standard super. So, it’s narrower and shallower. It looks a lot like a hive that’s been around for over a century.

The 6-and-5/8-inch equipment has long been known as the Illinois-depth hive. It was invented by the Dadant company, in Illinois, about 100 years ago.  8-frame boxes have been around even longer. When I was a lad, I worked for a fellow who ran 1,200 colonies – all in 8-frame equipment with shallow Illinois-depth frames. That was over 30 years ago.

In 1894, the beekeeping journal Gleanings ran several issues describing the benefits of using 8-frame equipment – they listed 24 key advantages.  I suppose that the Edmonton designer of the revolutionary hive, Dustin Bajer, knows that 8-frame equipment has been around for a long time. Bajer is also aware of the Illinois-depth box and frames because he calls them by that name on his equipment information web page.

The 8-frame Illinois box can be purchased from nearly all the larger bee equipment makers. Bajer claims to have “tweaked” existing equipment to come up with a hive which he describes as “bee-centric”,  using shallower, narrower boxes that are more like the bees’ natural home, the tree trunk. This is exactly how the beekeeper I had helped 30 years ago described his system.

The Edmonton Journal says Bajer has a “novel hybrid hive design” which is better suited to our northern climate and better suited for urban beekeepers.  Bajer seems to have taken existing equipment (plus a Warre section and a sloped lid) and presented it as the next big idea for northern urban beekeepers. Maybe he’s right.  I certainly admire his salesmanship.

Narrow, shallow hive with sloped roof - at my cousin's home in Europe. In use for hundreds of years.

Narrow, shallow hive with sloped roof – at my cousin’s home in alpine Europe. In use for hundreds of years.

This leads to an interesting point.  Old ideas are recycled over and over again in beekeeping. The top-bar hive (TB) is a good example. Aristotle described top bar hives 2,000 years ago. They were in continuous use in Greece for millennia. Yet most people think TBs are a recent invention.

Combining 8-frame Illinois-depth boxes, sloped lids, some Warre hive bodies and a screened bottom board may be the third-best idea since sliced bread, but such equipment is not new. However, it may be a unique fusion, like adding fried eggs to sweet potatoes and seasoning it with curry.  The fused hive may be exactly what Edmonton’s beekeepers need.

Want to give the Edmonton equipment a try? Here is a link to Bajer’s site. He offers handmade equipment, which I assume means no power tools were used in their manufacture. The site lists 8-frame Illinois-depth boxes, “Integrated Pest Management” bottom boards (they include screen mesh), and sloped hive lids. Bajer seems to make and sell other bee supplies as well. I have not seen any of his output first-hand, but it all looks neat and sturdy.

The equipment to set up one hive is listed at $200 (plus tax and shipping) and does not include any bees, wax, or frames. For $200, you get the IPM bottom board, a Warre section, a Warre lid, and four 8-frame Illinois boxes (without frames). That seems pretty expensive, but maybe not – four 8-frame Illinois boxes from Dadant in Illinois cost $60 US, plus shipping. So perhaps Bajer’s handmade boxes, bottom, and lid are priced about right.

old bike

Dustin Bajer, the promoter of this equipment, seems like a nice guy. For example, he told the Edmonton Journal’s reporter, “My ideal day is sitting on the deck with a glass of wine, just watching the bees go back and forth.”

I get that. My ideal day has a lot more activity, but I realize not everyone is me. However, I am not comfortable with the promotion of a 100-year-old idea as an innovative tweak of existing bee equipment, newly designed for the northern urban (Nuppie?) beekeeper. Maybe someone will design a 2-wheel human-powered vehicle with pedals and chain and tweak it by making one wheel bigger than the other. You say it’s been done?  In my mind, rebranding 8-frame Illinois-depth boxes as a new design is not too much different. (Even if it includes a cute sloping roof.)

Posted in Culture, or lack thereof, Hives and Combs, Save the Bees, Tools and Gadgets | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

L.L.L. – The Christmas Gift

Langstroth

Langstroth, 1810-1895

He invented modern beekeeping, yet the early life of Lorenzo Lorraine Langstroth was challenging, his mid-life was depressingly difficult, and his end life had just a bit of redemption mixed into an anguished mental landscape. However, he changed beekeeping to its core and on his birthday anniversary (Christmas Day!) we give homage to the most important beekeeper America ever produced.

Langstroth was born December 25, 1810. That was some Christmas gift to the world, wasn’t it? His childhood seems to have been typical for a kid who spent a lot of time on his hands and knees on the streets of Philadelphia, trapping bugs and ants with table scraps. “I was once whipped because I had worn holes in my pants by too much kneeling on the gravel walkways in my eagerness to learn all that I could about ant life,” Langstroth wrote.

He built paper traps for beetles and flies, leading to a traumatic experience when his grammar school teacher – fed up with six-year-old Lorenzo’s wasted bug time – smashed his paper cages and freed his flies. Lorenzo was sent to cry himself to sleep  inside a dark cupboard at the school. The teacher’s reform strategy worked. Langstroth gave up his interest in insects and became a preacher instead.

Langstroth's Andover church

Langstroth’s Andover church

Langstroth studied theology at Yale. At 25, he was offered a job as pastor at the South Church in Andover, Massachusetts. Even in Langstroth’s day it was an old prestigious church. In 2011 it celebrated its 300th anniversary. The plum assignment was a recognition of the young man’s abilities.

While visiting a parish member, Langstroth noticed a bowl of comb honey. He said that it was the most beautiful food he had ever seen. He asked to visit his new friend’s bees. Langstroth was led to the fellow’s attic where the hives were arranged near an open window. “In a moment,” Langstroth remembered, “the enthusiasm of my boyish days seemed,  like a pent-up fire, to burst out in full flame. Before I went home I bought two stocks of bees in common box hives, and thus my apiarian career began.” Langstroth had been bitten by the bee bug.

Throughout his lifetime, Langstroth suffered badly from manic-depression. In the mid-nineteenth century there was little anyone could do to help a person afflicted with mental illness. The only solace was temporary and usually came to Langstroth when he was with his bees.

The young minister felt that he wasn’t an effective parson because of his recurring dark days, so he quit preaching and became principal of a women’s school instead. By all accounts, he was a empathetic minister and a dedicated teacher, but bouts of depression forced him to cancel sermons and classes. He needed a change. Bees were the only thing he knew that could give him peace, comfort, and meaningful work and also fit into a life disrupted by debilitating illness. But sometimes not even bees could stop what he called his “head trouble” when darkness crept upon him.

By 1853, he had moved back to Pennsylvania. He built an apiary and expanded it. He hoped to make his living from bees. But that summer, severe depression returned and lasted for weeks. He sold all his colonies in the fall. Then he started with the bees again. His life would turn over again and again with periods of unbridled manic enthusiasm and productivity which were always followed by gloomy months of despondency. During his depressed phases, Langstroth took shelter in a bed in a dark room. He would remain there, immobile, for days. “I asked that my books be hidden from my sight. Even the letter “B” would remind me of my bees and instill a deep sadness that wouldn’t leave.”

When he was able to return to his bees, Langstroth made great strives at increasing his efficiency in the apiary. He learned to innovate and to make his tasks more effective. He would never know when depression would return so he worked day and night during his highly productive manic periods.

The major inefficiency in the apiary was the design of the boxes which held his bees. The boxes were usually simple wooden crates with solid walls and small holes which the bees used as entrances. During harvest of a hive, the lid was lifted from the crate. Attached to the lid would be wax combs which the bees built in haphazard jumbles. The combs cracked and broke during the beekeeper’s excavation, causing a sticky mess and disturbing the excited bees. It was a messy, nasty way to inspect bees and harvest honey.

Langstroth noticed that bees often left a small space around the edge of their combs. Sometimes, upon lifting the lids, he would find wax attached to both the lid and the walls inside the hive, while at other times the hanging combs were not stuck to the hive box at all. Langstroth’s brilliant insight was to notice that the space was about 3/8 of an inch when the combs hung freely. If a comb were closer than that to a wall, the bees would seal it to the wall. But at 3/8 inch (actually, between 6.35 and 9.53 mm), the bees always left a space. He had discovered “bee space”.

Langstroth’s brilliant application of his observation was to make wooden frames that held the wax combs. The frames dangled within the hive’s box so that their wooden edges were always 3/8 of an inch from anything that might touch the frame – the lid, the interior box walls, the box bottom, other frames. Positioned like this, the bees never waxed the frames together or to the sides or bottom of the hive. The result was a beehive with movable frames. Combs could be lifted, examined, and manipulated.

In 1851, Langstroth had his Eureka moment about bee space and frames. He might have run through the streets naked, shouting “bee space”, if it weren’t for the conservative New England dress code and the fact that his flash of insight had arrived in small measures, pointing him to a better hive and a better way to keep bees.

Langstroth frames, the heart of his invention

Langstroth frames, the heart of his invention (Source: R. Engelhard)

Langstroth’s simple idea made modern beekeeping possible. Colonies could be handled more gently. Frames could be inspected for disease, queen quality, and honey and pollen supplies. Movable frames meant queen bees could be produced and big strong hives could be split (by sharing frames between two or more hives), simultaneously increasing colony numbers and preventing swarming. It was a new era in beekeeping. The next few decades are still known as “The Golden Age of Beekeeping“.

L.L. Langstroth was not alone in figuring out bee space and inventing applications for it. About the same time, some European beekeepers (Huber, in Switzerland and Dzierzon in Poland/Germany, Prokopovich in the Ukraine, among others) had made similar discoveries. But Langstroth created a simpler and more easily used hive. His Langstroth beehive was a fine example of North American utilitarian craftsmanship. Efficient, simple, and cheap.

Langstroth’s invention was so simple and cheap that his patent was readily violated. Various sizes of frames and bee boxes were touted as novel improvements to Langstroth’s original design and therefore exempt from patent protection. Langstroth began a number of lawsuits against the more flagrant violators, but when the court cases began, so did his “head troubles”.

He dropped the litigation when he realized he could not win and when his illness prevented a spirited defense. Realistically, it was impossible to stop imitations and adaptations. Beekeepers – who were often handy farmers and carpenters – quickly built one or two hives with frames for themselves. Langstroth sought one dollar to license each box, which was a huge price in those days. But his real discovery was “bee space” which could not be patented. His position was like trying to patent sails for ships after discovering wind. Even Langstroth’s supporters wrote that Langstroth should have simply allowed the idea to flourish in the public domain. Trying to enforce the patent was expensive and ultimately left Langstroth nearly bankrupt.

Frames, dangling in a hive. (Source:

Frames, dangling in a hive. (Source: D. Feliciano)

With a plethora of modifications and with similar boxes being designed in Europe, Langstroth’s great contribution may have entered the world anyway and without much credit to him. But the retired minister had one other major contribution to society. It earned him much-deserved praise and even a bit of money. In one feverish manic spell that lasted six months, Langstroth wrote one of the greatest beekeeping books ever produced.

Langstroth's Hive and Honey-Bee, first published in 1853

Langstroth’s Hive and Honey-Bee,
first published in 1853

In 1852, working for six months without rest and very little sleep, Langstroth wrote The Hive and the Honey-Bee. This book, revised and expanded in more than 40 subsequent editions, is still one of the best sources of reliable beekeeping information. When Langstroth wrote it, there were other good bee primers on the market, but his book moved to the top spot. I’ve read the original 1853 book on-line and I have an 1859 copy of the book in its original smallish format with orange hardboard covers and 409 pages of fading text. Within the book are chapters on Loss of the Queen (and what to do about it), Swarming, Feeding, Wintering, and Enemies of the Bees. It’s a very practical guide to keeping bees and much of it is still relevant today.

Langstroth never had lasting peace from his cycles of manic depression, though in his 60s he traveled to Mexico and found that the stimulation and change of scenery gave him an unexpected respite from depression. The illness returned when he returned to his home, but he remembered the break from head troubles with great appreciation. He lived long enough (85 years!) to see his work appreciated and his book sell hundreds of thousands of copies. Despite his life-long disability, he had a long, full life, three children, and interesting work. And he made a phenomenal contribution to beekeeping.
Merry Christmas and Happy Birthday, Lorenzo Loraine Langstroth!

Posted in Books, Culture, or lack thereof, History, People | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

Black Pollen Day

honey bee collecting coffee grounds in pollen baskets

Arizona honey bee collecting coffee grounds in her pollen baskets.

Some bees eat coffee when they get desperate. I suppose some people do, too. We usually think that bees are always gleefully buzzing flower to flower, happy as ducks in water. But when food is scarce, anything goes. When my niece, Monica King, sent a picture of one of her honey bees collecting coffee grounds in lieu of pollen, I was impressed. It’s a great photo. Let’s take a closer look.

https://www.pinterest.com/swexplorations/

Close-up: Honey bee with coffee grounds on corbicula

Three things to notice. The tiny wad of pollen is tightly bound to the bee’s leg – it must have been stuck there intentionally by the bee; the bee has a bit of black dust on her abdomen; the pollen is black – that’s an unusual colour for a pollen pack. What’s going on here?

Last week, there was frost in southern Arizona where my niece lives. This wrecked most of the winter wildflowers, so yesterday this bee was one of many seen working the compost pile’s coffee grounds. Bees try to forage whenever the weather allows – even if flowers aren’t available. Monica found her bees gathering coffee granules. They were packing the bitter caffeine nuggets onto their legs. A couple months earlier, her sister in Florida had photographed two honey bees on a hive lid – one with orange, the other with black pollen. (Orange and black pollen in October – just in time for Halloween.) I tried to guess what Florida flower might yield black pollen, but couldn’t figure it out. Now we may have the answer. The bee with black pollen was likely carrying coffee, not real pollen.

bees arriving with pollen in AlbertaPollen is typically yellow or orange. I don’t think that I’ve ever seen red pollen – but I’m colour-blind, so I might have seen it but mistook it for green. Fireweed (which grows here) yields a rare blue pollen. Light green, brown, and gray/white are also seen, but black pollen is as rare as hen’s teeth. (Click here for a guide to some common pollen colours.)  Yellow and orange are the proper colours of pollen on posters at Save the Bees rallies. You can see correctly-coloured pollen in the photo above. I always get optimistic when I see scenes like this in Calgary in April.  The colony was still wrapped for winter (the wind had begun ripping the winter protection), but the bees had found pollen and they were their usual happy selves.

When bees get desperate, they scavenge almost anything similar to pollen (for protein) or nectar (carbohydrates). I’ve seen bees collect all sorts of odd stuff. People  have noticed honey bees rolling around in seed dust at bird feeders. Years ago, we were puzzled by bees that visited sawmills. They spent a lot of time hovering around the wet, freshly cut timber. Occasionally the bees lit and then sucked at the wood or moist sawdust. Other times they dove into it and got dusty.

 Sawdust, birdseed, coffee – they’re not necessarily bad.  Bees sometimes need salts and minerals beyond what they find in flowers. Often they don’t bother to stuff the pollen substitutes into their corbiculae. If the stuff doesn’t stick to the bee’s hairy legs, she may dive into the powder so that enough dust sticks and is carried home. Back at the hive, other bees pull it off and put it to use.   Monica’s picture clearly shows that the bee in the photo has tucked coffee to her leg – just a bit of her back is also covered in black dust.

Monica also sent this video clip of how the bees fetch coffee grounds.

They look agitated. (Too much caffeine?) It looks as if they are ‘rolling around’ in the coffee grounds.  But if you focus on one bee at a time and watch her, you may see that she is packing coffee into her corbicula as well.

 I wonder how the brood reacts when caffeinated low-protein grounds are mixed with honey and fed to the larvae as bee bread. Scientists recently showed that bees prefer nectar that has low levels of caffeine over nectar that has no caffeine in it. (Citrus nectar, among others, contains naturally occurring caffeine.)  Tests indicated that a bit of caffeine is attractive – probably as a stimulant – when mixed with test sugar syrup. But mixing in too much repelled the bees -they don’t like strong bitter flavours. The same experiment (reported in Cell journal) claimed that when honey bees received caffeine-laced food, they danced more rapidly and communicated with more colleagues than average bees. If coffee grounds collected by desperate bees visiting compost ends up in the mouths of bee-babes, the house bees may have a daunting task controlling their super-charged little angels when they emerge from their cells as young, highly-caffeinated adults.

Posted in Bee Biology, Strange, Odd Stuff | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

How the Honey Bee Got its Stinger

This will sound like a Rudyard Kipling  Just So Tale. But it goes back a lot further than the early 1900s. The Bee and Jupiter is credited to Aesop, of Aesop’s Fables Plus Punchline fame – and he lived 2,400 years ago.

Here’s the story:

cartoon bee with honeyA king bee visited Jupiter on Mount Olympus and gave him some delicious fresh honey. Jupiter was greatly pleased so he promised to give the king of bees anything he wanted.

“Give bees a stinger that kills so we can defend our honey from the race of man,” said the bee.

ZeusJupiter loved the race of man and didn’t want humans killed by bees’ stingers, but he had to keep his promise. Even today, bees have stingers that kill.  But clever Jupiter set things up so that the bee would be the one that the stinger kills.  Jupiter was true to his word, the bee got a sting that kills, and Aesop’s punchline, or moral, to his story is:
“Evil wishes, like chickens, come home to roost.”

Of course you know that this is just a tale and part of the story is wrong: Aesop was Greek, so the god would have been Zeus, not Jupiter. And bees have queens, not kings. Other than that, I suppose the story is pretty accurate, except from an evolutionary biologist’s point of view (but they like to use science to spoil everything).

You may have noticed that Aesop adds roosting chickens to the story, even though it’s a tale about bees and gods. I don’t know why he did that, or if it’s an apocryphal add-on, but now we know the reason that bees have stingers and chickens come home to roost. Sort of like killing two birds (or one bird and a bee) with one stinger. And maybe that’s where that old adage originated.

Jupiter and the Bee, from a 1479 woodcut in Aesop Fables

Jupiter and the Bee, from a 1479 woodcut in Aesop Fables

Posted in Culture, or lack thereof, History, Humour, Killer Bees, Stings | Tagged | 5 Comments

Beekeeping Promo Flashback

This video goes back about 15 years, but a friend asked me about the 6 minutes of local fame I experienced on the Dave Kelly morning show, so I looked up the film. The quality of the tape (and my acting) aren’t all that great, but it made me think about honey promotion and how we sometimes have to stick our necks out a wee bit to draw attention to something good. It was worth the effort to do the show!

I’m not sure how I got on The Big Breakfast, it wasn’t my choice. But I was head of the Calgary bee club at the time, so it must have been a favour to someone somewhere. Anyway, hope you have a smile from this. Don’t miss the expression on Dave Kelly’s face at about 3:00 into the video. He was quite a sport and a great host for the show.  By the way, the girl in the video is my older daughter, Erika. She’s still working in bees and honey.

Posted in Beekeeping, Comb Honey, Culture, or lack thereof, Honey, Movies, Outreach | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Honey with Vibes

amazon rainforest

True story. In a small town along Brazil’s Amazon, there is a warehouse with barrels of honey stacked on pallets. It’s organic honey, certified chemical-free, and it was produced by Africanized bees – the so-called killers of the bee world. All of that is somewhat ordinary. The odd thing about this honey, packed in stainless steel drums destined for Japan, is that musical vibes have been imbibed into its sweet molecules. You see, the buyer has insisted that beautiful new age music must be played day and night in the warehouse – to, um, energize it.

Amazon cotton field.

Amazon cotton field   (Source)

I heard about this honey from a Brazilian beekeeper who was given a special MP3 file to broadcast to his own honey barrels, but, alas, my friend failed to get his crop certified as organic. Some of his bee yards were too close to commercial cotton fields, down along the southern edge of the Amazon rainforest. He envied the other beekeeper who was receiving a huge premium for his special musically-enhance honey.

I understand how organic honey may be desirable. And Amazon jungle honey must be the coolest thing since New Zealand’s manuka. But honey that has spent a few weeks listening to meditative tunes? It makes my inner geophysicist wants to scream.

The idea that liquids may remember music in their molecular souls is akin to the memories that homeopathic preparations are said to retain. Even diluted a billion to one, some homeopathic water is believed to remember the chemicals that once floated in it, thus imparting effects far greater than cold water. I’m a skeptic, but there are plenty of believers out there – homeopathy is a billion dollar business. I’m glad it’s not true, else the folks down river from us would be drinking some really memorable water.

Some New Age vendors have taken to exploiting the sound vibration memory idea. The Holistic Works website would like to sell you personal sprays that have been subjected to musical vibrations. The call the stuff Flutterbye (Did you catch the stupid play on the word butterfly? Their entire web page is just as clever, making me think it’s all a joke. But it’s not.)

blue butterflyHere’s their advertising lead-in:  The flutterbye effect: healing resonance from butterflies, bees and dragonflies. These folks are selling “Sound Healing”. In a nutshell (and I really mean nutshell) the stuff you will spray in the air has been impregnated with the vibes of butterflies, dragonflies, and bees. They apparently record the 200-beats per minute buzz of a bee, then play that sound towards a jar of BioResonance Sound Spray so you can “build something very special into your energetic healing – the beating of the wings.” Two things you may need to know about these sound sprays: “Bioresonance Sound Sprays are great for spraying around your aura, as a personal spray”; and, “no tiny creatures were harmed in any way in making these resonant sprays.” Well, that’s certainly reassuring.

The butterfly spray’s vibrations will help you overcome your difficult past and bring peace and openness;  the bumblebee spray will help you overcome inertia and apathy and (as a bonus) you will be more able to relax into your etheric field. The cost for the spray, “made from new sound technology which encapsulates the vibrational sound of wings beating” is just $18.95 for 50 ml (about 4 tablespoons).   Sweet. Wish I had thought of it myself.

Posted in Apitherapy, Culture, or lack thereof, Hive Products | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Does Royal Jelly Make Royal Queens?

School kids need a new lesson about royal jelly.

School kids need a new lesson about royal jelly.

The kids in the Grade 5 classroom knew all about royal jelly.

“The bees feed it to their babies and they turn into queens.”

And so it is. We think. Royal jelly – countless journal articles (and Wikipedia) tell us – stimulates the latent she-ness in a female larva. It removes her from a future life of weary drudgery as a worker destined to live six short weeks who then dies wedged between some dusty stigma and anther. Royal jelly gives the lucky larva a future life as a queen employed in monotonous drudgery as an egg-laying machine destined to deposit progeny for three years in a crowded dark den, then die in a palace coup.  There’s not much of an advantage in the queen’s life. But it’s longer. And there must be a crown or something that comes with the job.

The Queen's Breakfast: Royal Jelly (Source: Wikimedia)

The Queen’s Breakfast: Royal Jelly (Source: Waugsberg)

The reason the queen lives three or four years instead a few weeks and lays eggs instead of stingers is because of nutrition. As a child, she was given the special food. At least that’s what I always thought. Now some upsetting scientists are trying to change the bees’ narrative.

In a nutshell, University of Illinois researchers have found that pollen-based food called bee bread, given to larvae that become worker bees, contains an acid that works as a DNA methylation agent. Methylation of DNA was discovered just a few years ago. It can shut off the way DNA makes proteins, changing the way living things look, grow, and function. Scientists think it controls epigenetics (the way the environment affects gene expression). This is nearly as important as DNA itself in changing the future of a creature. Environment affects DNA methylation which can turn off the way some genes work. So this new theory suggests that an important component of the environment – diet – turns off some genes in the female, suppressing their expression, resulting in worker bees.

My brother, David, feeding royal jelly to future queen bees.

My brother, David, feeding royal jelly to future queen bees.

Professional queen breeders, such as my brother, seen here grafting queen cells, know the value of keeping future queen bees swimming in a surplus of royal jelly. The new science changes nothing about that. But we now have a different way of thinking about what royal jelly actually does.

We used to think that royal jelly made queens and a lack of it led to sexually shriveled, stunted workers. Instead, it appears that bees provide their future workers with food which suppresses the natural tendency for a larva to become a queen. Worker larvae start off with royal jelly (for three days) but then the diet is modified to include honey and beebread (made from pollen). Honey and pollen are excellent foods for all of us, but they contain p-coumaric acid which works as an off-switch for bees.

The U of Illinois researchers, led by May Berenbaum,  confirmed their theory by raising queens in vitro, giving them the same amount of royal jelly that hive-reared larvae receive when they develop into queens. But by spiking the jelly with p-coumaric acid, less well-developed queens resulted.

This turns the bee world upside down and I like it. It’s great to challenge age-old assumptions about how things work. We naturally assumed that better nutrition results in better bees – in this case queens instead of workers. Some people carry this idea so far that they eat royal jelly so that they, too, may live much longer and lay insect eggs. The notion being promoted by this research is that the royal jelly isn’t what makes the queen. Instead, all fertile honey bee eggs will become queens – unless they are fed honey mixed with fermented pollen (bee bread).  Now that’s a game changer.

But this result (which you can read about here) is not without its critics. It is doubtful that it’s as simple as one chemical (p-coumaric acid) having full control over the sexual maturity of honey bees. Some scientists are pointing to different compositions of bee spit that gets mixed into the worker/queen foods in the bees’ kitchen. Others say they have been able to raise queens without using any royal jelly. However, the work by entomologists Berenbaum, Mao, and Schuler has opened a new look at the roll of royal jelly in the beehive. And this may lead to some revised lesson plans for the Grade Five kids at our local elementary school.

Posted in Bee Biology, Genetics, Queens | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

Bees, Beer, and Dead Mites

Bees and Beer (Source

Bees and Beer   (Source: YouTube)

Can beer save the bees? No, but with enough beer, bees may not care that mites are crawling all over them.  There have been headlines over the past month suggesting that beer will save the honey bees, but that’s not quite the real story.

Instead, there is a new natural miticide that kills Varroa mites. It’s based on hops, a product used to make beer.  A study from the Carl Hayden Bee Lab in Tucson showed that a solution of 1 per cent hops beta acid swabbed on worker bees’ backsides killed Varroa mites but not honey bees. Cardboard tabs dipped in a hops beta acid solution also eliminated mites when inserted into a beehive.

Alpha and beta hops acids are used in beer making. The beta acid is even more bitter than the alpha line. Bees avoid sipping bitter stuff, so they are unlikely to imbibe the brew material. Further, it appears to be safe for honey bees when used in the beehive. In the USA, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently approved the use of a commercially made hops beta acid application. This is important because it clears the way for yet another mite killer, this time a natural product, to be used inside the beehive.

Flowering Hops Plant

Flowering Hops Plant Source: Wikipedia

The new product is a biochemical miticide, Potassium Salts of Hops Beta Acids, which is derived from the cones of female hop plants, Humulus lupulus. The EPA registration allows beekeepers to use it in the fight against varroa mites. Significantly, it should allow beekeepers to take a break from other chemicals, disrupting the mite’s cycle of resistance which grows if the same products are repeatedly used to fight mites. The registrant is Beta Tech Hop Products,  which will make plastic strips containing the biopesticide.  According to a news release from the EPA itself, a biopesticide is a “naturally-occurring substance with minimal toxicity and a non-toxic mode of action against the target pest(s). There are numerous advantages to using biopesticides, including reduced toxicity to other organisms (not intended to be affected), effectiveness in small quantities, and reduced environmental impact.” That sounds good.

It’s not surprising that mites succumb to hops acid. Some of the other standard miticides are also acid-based. Oxalic acid and formic acid are examples. All of these – hops, oxalic, formic, and other acids – even pass the test for “organic” in most cases. (It depends on who’s rules you’re following.) But the difficult thing about these natural acids is that you have to use them at high enough concentrations to kill mites but low enough concentrations to not slaughter bees. And that can be really tricky. Air temperature, draft, and colony populations need to be factored in when preparing to fumigate with acids. Plus, beekeepers are notoriously inept at following instructions. Although these treatments usually work, they can kill your bees. Perhaps hops acid will not be so finicky to apply.

Initial reports about the safety and efficacy of hops is encouraging. The December 2012 report from  the Arizona bee lab shows Gloria DeGrandi-Hoffman as the contact researcher. Dr Hoffman is noted as a careful and thorough scientist. Her work was made public three years ago and already a commercial product has been derived from the research and is now available to beekeepers. A big hurdle was EPA approval, which was granted in October, 2015. Here is a summary of the research:

“Hop (Humulus lupulus L.) beta acids (HBA) were tested for miticidal effects on varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman, a parasitic mite of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). When varroa were placed on bees that had topical applications of 1 % HBA, there was 100 % mite mortality. Bee mortality was unaffected. Cardboard strips saturated with HBA and placed in colonies resulted in mite drop that was significantly greater than in untreated hives. HBA was detected on about 60 % of the bees in colonies during the first 48 h after application. Mite drop in colonies lasted for about 7 days with the highest drop occurring in the first 2-3 days after treatment. There was a reduction in the percentages of bees with HBA and in the amounts on their bodies after 7 days. Bee and queen mortality in the colonies were not affected by HBA treatments. When cardboard strips saturated with HBA were put in packages of bees, more than 90 % of the mites were killed without an increase in bee mortality. HBA might have potential to control varroa when establishing colonies from packages or during broodless periods.”
.

In late October, the EPA released its ‘tolerance’ exemption for hops acid, apparently offering a free pass if any is later found in honey. Here is part of what the government released:  “This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of the biochemical pesticide potassium salts of hops beta acids in or on honey and honeycomb for the control of Varroa mites in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices.“ This is good news for beekeepers – they can use what they need without risking contamination to their honey by a harsh chemical. Hope hops works as well as a cold beer to reduce everyone’s concerns about mites.

Varroa destructor on a honey bee, photographed by USDA Ag Research Service, using an electron microscope.

Varroa destructor on a honey bee,
photographed by the USDA Ag Research Service, using an electron microscope.

Posted in Diseases and Pests, Save the Bees | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

Bees Do the Darndest Things

Bees stuck below the mite screen. Janne cut an escape for them to move up.

Bees stuck below the mite screen. Janne cut an escape for them to move up.

Janne, a bee-club friend, called one afternoon and described something weird that was going on in one of her hives. She told me that her queen and all the brood had somehow ended up in the tiny space below the mite-screen at the base of her hive. The bees were living between the screen and the base of her bottom board. That’s right, a space about two inches thick. Above that towered a two-story stack of bee boxes with some bees in them. As it was October and she was getting the bees ready for winter, she wondered what she should do. Find the queen among the burr comb? Cut out the brood and move it into frames? Put a strong hive over the little hive that lived in the bottom board?  What would you do?

I told her what I might do, but your answer is probably different because that’s the way beekeeping is. We all have ideas, based on our experiences and knowledge. Problem is, none of us has the same experience nor the same amount of information. That’s why beekeeping is an art, or craft, and not a science. Entomology is a science, of course, but not beekeeping.

I usually dread phone calls from new beekeepers. They tell me that they think their queen is dead or they wonder if they should feed their bees.  “How the heck would I know?” is the right answer, but I never say that. I ask for as much detail as possible, but this puts the new beekeeper in an awkward position as they struggle to find the vocabulary and make sense of what they have seen. With enough information from the newbee, I might come up with some answers. But to be honest, I often guess wrong even when it’s my own bees and even though I have access to everything I should need to know to figure out a way to help the bees.

But my friend Janne is not a new beekeeper. She is smart and articulate. She even took pictures and e-mailed them to me so I could be even more sure of what her bees were doing. I think she asked my opinion to get some ideas, but maybe she just wanted me to hear her really odd bee story. Bees do the darndest things and Janne knows that I love these tales of woe from the hive.

I told Janne to get a knife and cut the screen. This might entice the queen to move up into the lower brood box. She told me that it already had some bees in it. The queen generally moves upwards as she lays eggs, so I figured releasing her would get her laying in frames instead of the crowded comb the bees had made in the bottom space. I also thought she should reduce the hive to one brood chamber but leave her mutilated bottom board in place because the brood would hatch and the young bees would move up to care for the brood.  Winter is coming, so I told Janne to feed the hive heavily and wrap the single-story with a lot of insulation. Bees here usually need two deep brood chambers to winter well, but if she keeps an eye on the colony and then feeds it in early March, it might make it.

Well, two weeks earlier, Janne had actually cut a ‘T” shape incision into the screen of her screened bottom board. She had probably already mentioned that to me in our first phone chat but I had missed hearing it.  So, we were thinking alike about the remedy. The day after we spoke, she was back in her little apiary again. She sent me the pictures you see here and an e-mail describing what she saw.

brood nest below mite screen

Looking down into the bottom board. The queen had been stuck here for a few weeks,
building her entire brood nest in this narrow little space!

Before opening the troubled hive, Janne spent a few moments watching the hive entrance. This is always a good idea. When you work your bees, take the time to really look at their flight. Are the bees jumpy, as if robbing is going on? Are they listless, like sick bees might be? Is there a huge flight? Or no flight?  Janne saw lots of bees using the proper hive entrance and just a few bees using the false entrance – the gap that led to the little chamber between the screened bottom and the hive base.

Janne pulled off both brood chambers and set them aside. Since I had recommended that she reduce the two-story hive to a single because the population would be small, she pulled the cover off the top box to begin the consolidation process. That’s when she discovered brood in the top box. The queen had wandered up from the narrow bottom board space in the two weeks since Janne had cut the mite screen.

My beekeeper friend then had a dilemma. Should she consolidate everything into a single box, or leave the hive as a ‘proper’ two-story assemblage?  (I had recommended consolidation into one box because I figured there would be just a few bees in the hive and they would have trouble ‘heating’ a bigger home.)  Janne decided to reverse the hive (and consolidate all the brood into the lower chamber) and keep it as a two-story hive.  She has to make that decision herself.  She knows how many bees are there what shape things are in. She still has the option to trim it down to a single, using a bee escape to empty bees from the top box.

All of this was two weeks ago. Now it’s November, we are getting chilly weather, and bee work has to end for the season.  In a few months, I’ll let you know if this little hive makes it through the harsh Canadian prairie winter.

 

Posted in Beekeeping, Friends, Hives and Combs | 1 Comment