The Bee Movie, Altered

bee-movie-posterBlending humor, tech prowess, and blatant disregard for the sacrosanct, youngsters have satirized Bee Movie on YouTube. Since it’s still winter break, and you may be looking for pointless online entertainment, here are some of the Bee Movies recently damaged by teenagers.

Jerry Seinfeld wrote and produced Bee Movie in 2007, just when colony collapse was being noticed. As such, it’s funny that his honey bees were not disappearing, but were going on strike for fair wages.

Before watching some of the parodies, you may want to watch this official trailer, as released by DreamWorks Animation, to remind you of the film.

So, that was just the trailer. Here’s the entire 91-minute Bee Movie, uncut, but shown in just 7 minutes: every time the word ‘bee’ is said, the movie speeds up.

Now, back to the Bee Movie official trailer, but all the honey bees were replaced by some kid in the basement. In this clip,  they look like bumble bees:

Here’s another way to watch the Bee Movie trailer – everytime the word ‘bee’ is said, the screen doubles its number of images. No one has every explained why this should have been someone’s Youtube project, but here it is.

If you’ve seen too many bees lately, here’s Bee Movie with every bee cut out. Confusing, yes, but it does get rid of the pesky little bugs.

Well, that’s quite enough, but it gives you an idea of what people with too much time have been doing the past few months. (Yup, writing beekeeping blogs.)

Posted in Culture, or lack thereof, Humour | Tagged | 2 Comments

Langstroth, the Christmas Gift

I’m repeating a blog which I posted on Christmas Day last year. It’s about the inventor of modern beekeeping, L.L. Langstroth. Enjoy!

Langstroth

Langstroth, 1810-1895

He invented modern beekeeping, making it easier, more productive, and less stressful for bees. However, Lorenzo Lorraine Langstroth earned nothing from his invention and suffered severely from self-doubt, melancholy, and clinical depression. Yet, he changed beekeeping to its core and on his birthday anniversary (Christmas Day!) we give homage to the most important beekeeper America ever produced.

Langstroth was born December 25, 1810. That was some Christmas gift to the world, wasn’t it? His childhood seems to have been typical for a kid who spent a lot of time on his hands and knees on the streets of Philadelphia, trapping bugs and ants with table scraps. “I was once whipped because I had worn holes in my pants by too much kneeling on the gravel walkways in my eagerness to learn all that I could about ant life,” Langstroth wrote.

He built paper traps for beetles and flies, leading to a traumatic experience when his grammar school teacher – fed up with six-year-old Lorenzo’s wasted bug time – smashed his paper cages and freed his flies. Lorenzo was sent to cry himself to sleep inside a dark cupboard at the school. The teacher’s reform strategy worked. Langstroth gave up his interest in insects and became a preacher instead.

Langstroth's Andover church

Langstroth’s Andover church

Langstroth studied theology at Yale. At 25, he was offered a job as pastor at the South Church in Andover, Massachusetts. Even in Langstroth’s day it was an old prestigious church. In 2011 it celebrated its 300th anniversary. The plum assignment pastor at South Church – was a recognition of the young man’s abilities.

While visiting a parish member, Langstroth noticed a bowl of comb honey. He said that it was the most beautiful food he had ever seen. He asked to visit his new friend’s bees. Langstroth was led to the fellow’s attic where the hives were arranged near an open window. “In a moment,” Langstroth remembered, “the enthusiasm of my boyish days seemed, like a pent-up fire, to burst out in full flame. Before I went home I bought two stocks of bees in common box hives, and thus my apiarian career began.” Langstroth had been bitten by the bee bug.

Head troubles

Throughout his lifetime, Langstroth suffered badly from manic-depression. In the mid-nineteenth century there was little anyone could do to help a person afflicted with mental illness. The only solace was temporary and usually came to Langstroth when he was with his bees.

The young minister felt that he wasn’t an effective parson because of his recurring dark days, so he quit preaching and became principal of a women’s school instead. By all accounts, he was a empathetic minister and a dedicated teacher, but bouts of depression forced him to cancel sermons and classes. He needed a change. Bees were the only thing he knew that could give him peace, comfort, and meaningful work and also fit into a life disrupted by his debilitating illness. But sometimes not even bees could stop what he called his “head trouble” when darkness crept upon him.

He built an apiary and hoped to make his living from bees. But that summer, severe depression returned and lasted for weeks. He sold all his colonies in the fall. Then he started with the bees again. His life would turn over again and again with periods of manic enthusiasm and productivity  followed by gloomy months of despondency. During his depressed phases, Langstroth took shelter in a bed in a dark room. He would remain there, immobile, for days. “I asked that my books be hidden from my sight. Even the letter “B” would remind me of my bees and instill a deep sadness that wouldn’t leave.”

When he was able to return to his bees, Langstroth made great strives at increasing his efficiency in the apiary. He learned to innovate and to make his tasks more effective. He would never know when depression would return so he worked day and night during his highly productive manic periods.

Eureka!

The major inefficiency in the apiary was the design of the boxes which held his bees. The boxes were usually simple wooden crates with solid walls and small holes which the bees used as entrances. During harvest of a hive, the lid was lifted from the crate. Attached to the lid would be wax combs which the bees built in haphazard jumbles. The combs cracked and broke during the beekeeper’s excavation, causing a sticky mess and disturbing the excited bees. It was a messy, nasty way to inspect bees and harvest honey.

Langstroth noticed that bees often left a small space around the edge of their combs. Sometimes, upon lifting the lids, he would find wax attached to both the lid and the walls inside the hive, while at other times the hanging combs were not stuck to the hive walls at all. Langstroth’s brilliant insight (his Eureka! moment)  was to notice that the space was about 3/8 of an inch when the combs hung freely. If a comb were closer than that to a wall, the bees would seal it. But at 3/8 inch (actually, between 6.35 and 9.53 mm), the bees always left a space. He had discovered “bee space”.

Langstroth’s next step was brilliant. He made wooden frames that held the wax combs. The frames dangled within the hive’s box so that their wooden edges were always 3/8 of an inch from anything that might touch the frame – the lid, the interior box walls, the box bottom, other frames. Positioned like this, the bees neither waxed the frames together nor to the sides or bottom of the hive. The result was a beehive with movable frames. Combs could be lifted, examined, and manipulated. It was 1851 and modern beekeeping had begun.

Langstroth frames, the heart of his invention

Langstroth frames, the heart of his invention (Source: R. Engelhard)

Colonies could be handled more gently. Frames could be inspected for disease, queen quality, and honey and pollen reserves. Movable frames meant queen bees could be produced and strong hives split (by sharing frames between two or more new hives) – increasing colony numbers while preventing swarming. It was a new era in beekeeping. The next few decades are still known as “The Golden Age of Beekeeping“.

Easy to use, easy to make, easy to copy

L.L. Langstroth was not alone in figuring out bee space and inventing applications for it. About the same time, some European beekeepers (Huber, in Switzerland and Dzierzon in Poland/Germany, Prokopovich in the Ukraine, among others) had made similar discoveries. But Langstroth created a simpler and more easily used hive. His Langstroth beehive was a fine example of North American utilitarian craftsmanship. Efficient, simple, and cheap.

Langstroth’s invention was so simple and cheap that his patent was readily violated. Minor modifications were touted as significant improvements to Langstroth’s original design, circumventing the patent. Langstroth began a number of lawsuits against the more flagrant violators, but when the court cases began, his “head troubles” returned.

He dropped the litigation when he realized he could not win and when his illness prevented a spirited defense. Realistically, it was impossible to stop imitations and adaptations. Beekeepers – who were often handy farmers and carpenters – quickly built one or two hives with frames for themselves. Langstroth sought one dollar to license each box, which was a huge price in those days. But his real discovery was “bee space” which could not be patented. His position was like trying to patent sails for ships after discovering wind. Even Langstroth’s supporters wrote that Langstroth should have simply allowed the idea to flourish in the public domain. Trying to enforce the patent was expensive. It left Langstroth nearly bankrupt.

Frames, dangling in a hive. (Source:

Frames, dangling in a hive. (Source: D. Feliciano)

With a plethora of modifications and with similar boxes being designed in Europe, Langstroth’s great contribution may have entered the world anyway and without much credit to him. But the retired minister had one other major contribution to society. It earned him much-deserved praise and even a bit of money. In one feverish manic spell that lasted six months, Langstroth wrote one of the greatest beekeeping books ever produced.

Hive and Honey Bee

Langstroth's Hive and Honey-Bee, first published in 1853

Modern copy of Langstroth’s 1853
Hive and Honey-Bee

In 1852, working for six months without stop and almost no sleep, Langstroth wrote The Hive and the Honey-Bee. This book, revised and expanded in more than 40 subsequent editions, is still one of the most reliable sources for beekeepers. When Langstroth wrote it, there were other good bee primers on the market, but his book moved to the top spot. You may read the original 1853 book on-line.  I’ve read and re-read my 1859 copy with its 409 pages of fading text protected by orange hardboard covers. It earned its spot in my library. Within the book are chapters on Loss of the Queen (and what to do about it), Swarming, Feeding, Wintering, and Enemies of the Bees. It’s a very practical guide to keeping bees and much of it is still relevant today.

Langstroth never had lasting peace from his cycles of manic depression, though in his 60s he traveled to Mexico and found that the stimulation and change of scenery gave him an unexpected respite from depression. The illness returned when he returned to his home, but he remembered the break from head troubles with great appreciation. He lived long enough (85 years!) to see his work appreciated, his name honored, and his book sell hundreds of thousands of copies. Despite his life-long disability, he had a long, full life, three children, and interesting work. And he made a phenomenal contribution to beekeeping.

Merry Christmas and Happy Birthday,
Lorenzo Loraine Langstroth!

Posted in Beekeeping, Books, History, Hives and Combs, People | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Don’t throw good money after bad beekeeping

Appreciate the review at Bees with EEB!
Reblogged on badbeekeepingblog.com

Erik's avatarBees with eeb

miksha-bad-beekeepingContinuing with the winter theme, another recent read was Ron Miksha’s book Bad Beekeeping. Miksha maintains a blog of a similar name for sharing his thoughts on the world of bees and beekeeping. He mentioned the book in a post so I thought I would pick up a copy in support of his ongoing efforts. Here is a short review.

View original post 695 more words

Posted in Books, Reblogs | Tagged | Leave a comment

Non-science Brains as Scientists

duncecap

It seems that youngsters who are not particularly gifted in science and math are more likely to want a science job later in life. Kids who excel in science are less likely to want to be scientists. At least, that’s the odd result from testing and polling 540,000 15-year-olds in 70 countries.

The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is an evaluation of the competency of a half million 15-year-old students, randomly chosen from the world’s 35 OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries and over 30 non-OECD countries (places like Croatia, Uruguay, China, Singapore, Russia). Here’s a link to PISA. You can get the raw data there and inspect their methods and summary reports.

Every three years, the newest crop of 15-year-olds take the PISA Reading, Science, and Math exams. The OECD does this so various education techniques can be compared with the kids’ results. For example, what leads to higher scores: More homework? More money dumped into the education system? A smaller teacher/student ratio? (No, Sometimes, Yes.)  If you are interested in this sort of thing, the reports and the PISA data are publicly available.

2015-pisa-rank

2015 Science Rank

PISA is also a ranking system enjoyed by gloaters in select countries.  In reading, Canada tied with Hong Kong for second place in the world. (Singapore was number 1, USA #24, Russia #26). Singapore was number one in math, science, and reading. Canada was in the top ten in everything. Other high-scoring countries are Finland, Japan, Estonia, and China.  The analysis indicates that a lot of factors make the difference. National wealth, priorities (sports/fitness, nutrition, health care), and culture interact to define the success of students. The Economist has a nice analysis of the results.

While I was reading the tables of numbers, I happened upon some curious data. In the most recent assessment (2015), PISA asked participants: “Do  you think that you will pursue a career in science?” From the answers, the OECD guesstimates how many future scientists may be entering university. On average, the number was encouraging – 26% of 15-year-olds worldwide think that their future career (as physicians, engineers, science-teachers, chemists, computer scientists, researchers, etc.) will involve science. But here’s the odd thing: youngsters who did poorly on the science exams were actually more likely to think that they will become scientists.

The most blatant example of the gap between career aspirations and expertise is found in the country of Dominican Republic. Students there did more poorly than any of the other tested countries. The average science score places 15-year-old D.R. students 7 academic years behind 15-year-olds in Singapore.  In D.R., performance is at a Grade 5 level while in Singapore, the scores indicate a Grade 12 achievement. By the way, American students performed roughly 3 years behind the Singapore kids but just one year behind the world average.

So, the Dominican Republic came in last in science skill. But that country was first in science career aspiration. 45% of Dominican Republic’s 15-year-olds hope to take a career in science, according to the PISA study. That’s higher than any other country. Some other countries showed a similar dichotomy, but not as severe. I did a simple Pearson’s correlation (Science aptitude and Science career aspiration). For the 70 countries, there is a negative 0.49 correlation, which is reasonably strong. The Dominican Republic is a bit of an outlier, so I masked it and the correlation went down just a little, to  -0.45. My plot, below, is a bit scary – it is unfortunately obvious that decreasing skill is accompanied by increasing confidence.

pisa-earth-space-2015-for-15-yr-olds-with-domrep

Plot of science career aspiration as a function of science skill. Each dot is a country. Dominican Republic, upper left, shows high confidence but low science score. Dot furthest right is Singapore with highest science skill and slightly above average confidence. The sloping blue line is a linear least squares fit, showing negative correlation of skill and confidence. (Data from PISA)

The USA is below the world average in science (and math and reading) but with 38% expecting a career in science, many of its children are nevertheless thinking that they’ll have a science career.

I realize that there can be a lot of reasons for boys and girls to claim that they will pursue science – motivators could be cultural and financial. However, I wonder if hubris also plays a role. Even doing poorly in science, some 15-year-olds nevertheless think that they will work as scientists. It may be a case of not knowing the unknown. I’ve fallen into this same trap myself. After flipping through an easy-to-read science book (How to Remove Your Own Appendix, or Quantum Explanations of Everyday Accidents), I’m sure I can remove my own appendix or teach nuclear physics because it just sounds so easy. I’m not an expert, but heck, I can do it.

Beekeeping, the usual theme of this blog, also offers opportunities to see over-confidence in action. The newest beekeepers often have it all figured out, until they realize much later that they knew very little. I suspect that’s the main reason foundering science students think science should be their career.

 

Posted in Culture, or lack thereof, Outreach, Strange, Odd Stuff | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

National I Love Honey Day

Today – December 18 – is National “I Love Honey Day”. I’m not sure whose idea this one is, but it’s a good one. America should have a national honey day – it’s the world’s largest honey customer. Maybe it should be extended to a full month. Iceland, of course, has a National Honey Week, as you can see in this video.

I used to sport a T-shirt that invited people to “Eat Your Honey Everyday” but then I realized that folks who saw me wearing it didn’t always get the beekeeping connection. Anyway, please celebrate National I Love Honey Day by devouring some floral honey today. You probably won’t regret it.

Posted in Culture, or lack thereof, Honey, Humour | Tagged , | 2 Comments

A Century of Honey Songs

It’s Sunday morning, just a week before Christmas. I’m hoping that your bee work is done and you have some time to listen to a few tunes from honey-throated singers and sticky-fingered musicians.

Our first gift to you is Flight of the Bumblebee as you’ve never heard it before. Nicholai Rimsky-Korsakov wrote this for his opera The Tale of Tsar Saltan in 1899 as a gift to the Russian people on the centenary of Alexander Pushkin’s birth. The opera is based on Pushkin’s own Tale of Tsar Saltan which is the story of a prince who was turned into a bumble bee so he could sting his treacherous grandmother on her nose. Here the Flight of the Bumblebee was famously rearranged and transcribed for piano by Russian composer Sergei Rachmaninoff. I heard that Rachmaninoff arranged this piece as a finger exercise for first-year piano students, but I might be mistaken. As you can see in the video, you don’t even need a performer if Rachmaninoff’s ghost is near. Here’s our salute to the bumble bee prince:


Less than ten years after Flight of the Bumblebee, folks would sometimes tickle the ivories in their parlor rooms with a bit of ragtime. (Or they’d go downtown and hear it played right.)  This is called The Stinging Bee, a real rag two-step, written by Mike Bernard around 1908.


We have to have something for the kids. And it turns out to be the only song on this page that’s actually about honey. It’s Disney’s Winnie the Pooh and Everything is Honey. This is a new release, from a new movie. But doesn’t the music sound like it belongs to the 1940s?


From his 1951 recording of Sail On, Honey Bee, Muddy Waters sails on his guitar like few ever have. Here’s blues at its bluest. This live recording is probably from the mid-70s as Muddy Waters is showing age. Listen close to the guitar about three minutes in and you’ll hear a lot of buzzin’ that sounds like a little honey bee, maybe caught in a mason jar.


In the late 40s and early 50s, Rhythm and Blues was becoming popular. But the jazzy boogie sound would soon get drowned out by it’s own child, Rock n’ Roll. Before it left, there were a few authentic performers who had a lot of fun on stage – like Martha Davis, for example.  She knows the piano. Now you get to know her from Goodbye, Honey Goodbye. No bees and not much honey here, except as a lovey-dovey endearment. Which makes me wonder – when did people make a habit of asking, “What’s for supper, honey?” When did “Hi, honey!” become acceptable?  Anyway, here’s an old film of Honey Goodbye from a live 1954 performance of The Rhythm & Blues Revue, a time when the word honey could be used sarcastically.


By 1957, Rock n’ Roll was taking over, but some country hybrid was also kicking up saw dust. It’s a little before my time, but it still moves me.  Here’s a Rockabilly classic, Honeycomb by Jimmie Rodgers. It’s a hopping, dancing, clapping tune about a “walkin’ talkin’ honeycomb.” Note the bees on Jimmie’s backdrop cloth.


The Bee Movie borrowed a bubblegum pop tune from The Archies that dates back to around 1967. The song is as awful as the next one in this queue, but the video does have scenes from the more recent Seinfeld production about bees going on strike because of no pay and polluted working conditions. So, because of that small redemption, here’s The Archies with “Sugar, Sugar (Honey, Honey)”:


The late 1960s had some pretty syrupy songs, none better than Bobby Goldsboro’s Honey. “She was always young at heart, kinda dumb and kinda smart…” and it goes on to “…she wrecked the car and she was sad, and so afraid that I’d be mad, but what the heck.”  But then the angels came and got her.  Released in 1968, Honey sold millions and you’d hear it everywhere, especially blaring from transistor radios at the beach where teenagers mopped their wet eyeballs. If you missed that era, here’s your chance to catch up on the culture, if you really want to. The Cincinnati Enquirer reported that Goldsboro’s song “usually appears on worst songs of all-time” lists. But it was covered by Percy Faith, Dean Martin, Lawrence Welk, Aaron Neville and dozens of others, so maybe the Enquirer is wrong. You decide.  Go ahead, hum along. I know you want to.


Twenty years ago, when the Peter Fonda movie about a tupelo honey beekeeper named Ulee Jackson came out, the country-genre song Tupelo Honey, by Van Morrison, became my favourite. It’s still near the top for me. You might think that Van Morrison had written Tupelo Honey for Ulee’s Gold as it fit the film so well. But Victor Nuñez produced his award-winning movie in 1997 while Van Morrison released his award-winning album way back in 1971.  Perhaps Nuñez scripted his movie because of Van Morrison’s music. They are both fantastic works of art, and both feature Florida’s sweet, sweet tupelo honey. Here’s a live video of the song, recorded in 1979.


My list of bee-related music has to include this 2002 ditty by a Norwegian band that claims they titled their group (Miksha) after me.  They said that they were looking for a name and they heard about my Vietnam war experiences as a bad beekeeper who developed secret toxic weapons from bee venom. Well, I told them that I was too young for the war and if I had worked on secret toxins, that would forever remain secret. Undeterred, they picked Miksha, my last name, as their group name. The genre – extreme machine metal rock – is something I can completely relate to, because I once took a welding class. Here’s Miksha’s least offensive song, Half the Battle. It’s not about bees, but it deserves a mention because it sounds like an unbalanced extractor.


I know that there are more of these out there, but I’ll end with my current favourite, Honeybee, from 2012. It’s by the steampunk group Steam Powered Giraffe. Steam punk is an alternative-history-embracing counterculture that envisages a modern world without electricity, where steam powers everything. To appreciate the video, it helps to know that the group started as street mimes in San Diego, studied theatre, and the lead singers were once twin boys but now they are brother and sister. I really love the sound, the clarity, the harmony, the spare acoustics, and the folksie melody. Hope you like this one, too!

There you go, more than a hundred years of bees and honey sounds – from classical through rag-time, blues, R&B, rockabilly, pop, country, metal, and steampunk. I hope at least one of these will give you an earworm that lasts all day.

 

Posted in Culture, or lack thereof, Movies, Strange, Odd Stuff | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Meet the Family Caste

Yesterday, I vented about honey bees and honeybees – the former being correct, the latter wrong. Today’s a new day, so here’s a new vocab issue. In today’s interesting world of blended boundaries, I thought I’d write a few words about gender and caste among honey bees. I’m not going to dig deeply into the science, just skimming the surface here.

You will frequently read or hear that bees have three castes. They don’t. I’m sure that I’ve made the same error – describing worker, queen, and drone as the three honey bee castes. Entomologists smarter than I have also made that mistake in their books and articles. So, here’s the scoop.

Half the chrome

Half the chrome

Honey bees are not gender-fluid. A drone is stuck in his manliness because he is born with just half the number of chromosomes (16) compared to what’s awarded to female honey bees. If the queen lays an unfertilized egg, it has only her own chromosomes, just a half set, resulting in a haploid creature which we call a drone. A drone bee has no father. Just a Mum.  If the queen fertilizes her egg while depositing it, then the fertile egg has a full chromosome set and it becomes a female. Honey bees can’t cross the gender boundary. Drones are clearly different from the other bees, but they are not a caste. They’re  a gender.

On the other hand, (female) honey bees are caste-fluid, at least while they are still formless little sacks of larval pulp. If it’s fed a royal diet instead of the worker-caste gruel of a commoner, the worm becomes a queen instead of a worker. They’re both still females. But they are different castes of female with differently developed bodies. They have different futures, different jobs.

So, honey bees have two castes – worker and queen, and they have two genders – male and female. If you catch me messing this up, send me a note or sign into the comments sections on my blogs and set me straight. Together, we can end the three-caste system and build a better world for honey bees everywhere.  (My thanks to Erik for inspiring this little blog-post. He wrote about this subject in detail over at his blog, Bees with eeb, a couple of days ago.)

Don’t be a Dummy about this!

Believing that honey bees have three castes is for Dummies. But you know better.

Believing that honey bees have three castes is for Dummies. But you know better.

Posted in Bee Biology, Books, Queens | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

Spelling Bees with Uncommon Names

spelling-honey-bee

I’m not a grammarian, I don’t have the most hugest vocabulary, and I have been known to produce some pretty bad spells of whetther – but even I appreciate the right word, used and spelt correctly. Without rules, confusion reigns (and rains and rains).  I’m glad when someone points out errors I’ve made – it gives me a chance to learn.

I’m coming back to something I’ve written about before and then I’m moving on to something I’ve never written about.  Honey bee – it really should be two words, not one. I think the single word honeybee is just plain wrong. But I notice that some dictionaries disagree with me. Webster’s, for example.  Webster’s has also allowed yellow jacket instead of yellowjacket, which is just plain ridiculous. But then, Wikipedia also has an entry for ‘yellow jacket’ instead of yellowjacket, so maybe the whole world is coming to a spectacular illiterate end.

Snodgrass's bee's tracheal system

Snodgrass’s bee’s tracheal system, 1910.
Snodgrass is our final authority.

If you can’t trust Wikipedia or the dictionary, who can you trust? How about the ESA – the Entomological Society of America? They are the keepers of the bugs’ names and should be our final authority on this. They have adopted the ideas of Robert Evans Snodgrass (a bee anatomist!) for their rules on the common names for all insects.

In the etymology of entomology, R.E. Snodgrass makes sense. If it’s a bee that carries carpentry tools, it’s a carpenter bee. A wasp may wear a yellow jacket, but such a creature is called a yellowjacket (one word) according to the ESA. Finally, since our honey bee is a bee that makes honey, let’s give her that bit of credit and acknowledge her efforts: honey bee. Two words.

Snodgrass, who wrote “Anatomy of the Honey Bee” in 1910, says:

“We have such names as house fly, blow fly and robber fly contrasted with dragonfly, caddicefly and butterfly, because the latter are not flies, just as an aphislion is not a lion and a silverfish is not a fish. The honey bee is an insect and is preeminently a bee; ‘honeybee’ is equivalent to ‘Johnsmith.’”

So, don’t Johnsmith me. Go with the American bee expert and the Entomological Society of America instead of Webster (who also misspells colour, plough, and centre). Snodgrass and the ESA use honey bee (the type of bee slathered in honey) and not Honeybee (the name of Steam Powered Giraffe’s honeyed melody).

The Entomological Society of America calls honey bee and silverfish “common names”. There are a million bugs, but in English, only a couple thousand have common names. To name all the ones lacking common names, we use uncommon names – official latinesque scientific nomenclatures.

For the honey bee, the scientific name is Apis mellifera. Note the italics – that’s expected, but often ignored. Apis is Latin for bee while mellifera is a Greek-Latin hybrid of honey (meli) and carry (fero), hence, the honey-carrying bee. We also have a few dozen subspecies of honey bees (Italian bees, Apis mellifera ligustica; German black bees, Apis mellifera mellifera; Africanized honey bees, Apis mellifera scutellata). Only seven species of Apis are recognized. These include our mellifera plus the Eastern honey bee (cerana), the big south Asian dorsata, and florea, the dwarf red bee.

bee-familyWorking up the ranks, from subspecies (mellifera) to species (mellifera) to genus (Apis), we reach the family (Apidae) which again means bee. So, in the case of Europe’s original ‘black bee’, we have the scientific name Apidae Apis mellifera mellifera, which means ‘bee bee honeycarrier honeycarrier’. It’s probably best not to give taxonomists a lot of credit for imagination. Apidae, by the way, lumps honey bees together with bumble bees, stingless bees, carpenter bees, orchid bees and a few others.

Overseeing the family of Apidae, there are the clade and superfamily of bees which account for all of the known 20,000 or more bee species in the world. Above this is the suborder Apocrita containing bees, wasps, and ants which in turn are all part of the Hymenoptera (‘membrane-winged’) order. Hymenoptera are among the million plus Insectas which are spineless Anthropoda. They are members of the kingdom Animalia, which means that they are animals and not rocks, paper, or scissors.

So we have it, the old world black honey bee that you may still find skepped in isolated parts of northern Europe is properly identified as Animalia Anthropoda Insecta Hymenoptera Apocrita Apidae Apis mellifera mellifera. If you say “honey bee” I’ll know what you mean. But if you write “honeybee” I’ll know that you haven’t been properly schooled about our favourite animal.

Posted in Bee Biology, Culture, or lack thereof | Tagged , , , | 8 Comments

Two Wonderful Podcasts

Thanks for this post, LSE! It’s so good I had to reblog it!

LSE Bees's avatarLSE Bees

Winter is a quiet season for beekeepers, so what better time to make yourself a steaming mug of cocoa and settle down to two great podcasts about bees!

The first podcast is a public discussion held at LSE by the Forum for European Philosophy, titled Hive Minds: Collective Intelligence in Humans and Other Animals. The panelists are Christian List (philosopher, LSE), Elli Leadbeater (social insect biologist, Royal Holloway), and Larissa Conradt (evolutionary theorist, Max Planck Institute for Human Development).

swarm A swarm of bees (Image credit: Nilfanion, CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons)

Leadbeater opens the discussion brilliantly, asking us to picture a swarm of honey bees who have just left a hive. So now they are clustering on a tree branch, with about three days to find a new home before they run out of food. Scout bees fly off in all directions looking for nesting sites with certain desirable features – large…

View original post 403 more words

Posted in Reblogs | 1 Comment

Sweet Stats

Yesterday, Stats Canada released honey bee numbers for 2016. Canada now has more colonies ever. That’s  right – more hives of honey bees than ever, in all of our recorded history. Our numbers are now over 750,000 colonies.

The last time Canada had a big colony count ramp-up was in the mid-1980s. We reached 707,000 colonies in 1986. Then, over the next three years, our colony count collapsed to below 500,000 hives in 1991. It wasn’t bee disease or CCD that caused Canada’s colony collapse. It was a new law that stopped honey bee imports from the USA. Canadian bees that died during our long brutally cold winters couldn’t be cheaply replaced so about one-third of Canada’s beekeepers left the bee business. The mistake cost Canadian beekeepers millions of dollars and shows what happens when people who don’t know much about beekeeping make the rules.

Canada has finally had a few good years, but I predict that colony counts will be down a little next year, this time because the wholesale price of honey has fallen quite a lot. Some beekeepers will probably not replace all of their winter dead-outs. As a result, I think Canada’s colonies will number fewer than 700,000 in 2017.

Canada’s 2016 honey production is estimated as 92.2 million pounds. That’s a 123 pound per hive average. Respectable, but not Canada’s best – that  was 1998 when the national average was 180 pounds per colony. Few other places on Earth are as prolific, nor do they make the delicious snow-white honey that’s found in Canada.

High-glucose honey - safely in a jar.

Great Canadian honey – and lots of it!

Posted in Honey, Save the Bees | Tagged , | 4 Comments